Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Among the General Population in Africa During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Medical and socio-economic uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic have had a substantial impact on mental health. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature reporting the prevalence of anxiety and depression among the general populace in Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine associated risk factors. Methods: A systematic search of the following databases African Journal Online, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from database inception until 30th September 2021. Studies reporting the prevalence of anxiety and/or depression among the general populace in African settings were considered for inclusion. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Meta-analyses on prevalence rates were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-analysis software. Results: Seventy-eight primary studies (62,380 participants) were identified from 2,325 studies via electronic and manual searches. Pooled prevalence rates for anxiety (47%, 95% CI: 40-54%, I2 = 99.19%) and depression (48%, 95% CI: 39-57%, I2 = 99.45%) were reported across Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sex (female) and history of existing medical/chronic conditions were identified as major risk factors for anxiety and depression. Conclusions: The evidence put forth in this synthesis demonstrates the substantial impact of the pandemic on the pervasiveness of these psychological symptoms among the general population. Governments and stakeholders across continental Africa should therefore prioritize the allocation of available resources to institute educational programs and other intervention strategies for preventing and ameliorating universal distress and promoting psychological wellbeing. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021228023, PROSPERO CRD42021228023.

The association between vertebral endplate structural defects and back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To clarify the current state of knowledge on the association of endplate structural defects and back pain. METHODS: Five databases were searched for studies reporting on the association between endplate structural defects and back pain. Covidence and comprehensive meta-analysis software were used for article screening and selection and pooling of extracted data. Overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies comprised of 11,027 subjects met inclusion criteria. The presence of moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 73%; p = 0.001) prevented the pooling of estimates across all studies. However, it was possible to pool studies of specific endplate defect phenotypes, such as erosion (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.35-5.50) and sclerosis (OR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.50-2.58), which yielded significant associations with back pain. Schmorl's nodes were also associated with most individual back pain phenotypes (OR: 1.53-1326, I2 = 0-7.5%) and back pain overall (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.37-1.94, I2 = 26%) in general population samples. The pooling of data from all studies of specific back pain phenotypes, such as frequent back pain (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.77-4.52) and back pain incidence (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.30-2.10), each yielded significant association with endplate structural defects and was supported by low heterogeneity (I2 = < 7.5.%). CONCLUSION: Overall, there is moderate quality evidence of an association between back pain and endplate structural defects, which is most evident for erosion, sclerosis and Schmorl's nodes. Going forward, research on specific endplate defect phenotypes and back pain case definitions using strong study designs will be important in clarifying the extent of associations and underlying mechanisms. The study was prospectively registered in Prospero (CRD42020170835) on 02/24/2020.